...
- Use Advanced Forums; they are similar to regular Moodle forums but allow you to search for author or keywords, and there is a quick summary report so you can gauge participation.
- In large cohorts, assign students to Moodle Groups to make the discussion more manageable.
- When setting up a Forum:
- Add brief but clear instructions to the Description. This is the first thing students see when they open the Forum.
- Use Discussion locking to make forums read-only after a set amount of time. This keeps the discussion focused.
- Consider setting the Group mode for your Forums to Visible Groups so that students can see, but not post, to the discussion of other groups. This can allow students to see a range of responses and feedback. The alternative is to set Group mode to Separate Groups in which students can't see each other's group discussion.
- Release your forum on a specific date by using Restrict access.
- Integrate your forum with other Moodle activities;
- to spark discussion, add a reading using the Reading List activity or a Video. After the discussion, use the Choice activity to poll student's on whether the forum debate changed their view.
Example approaches
Examples of asynchronous Asynchronous discussion activities forums can be used to teach and support a range of assessment tasks. Some examples are given below. These examples can be adapted for a wide variety of academic disciplines and are not intended to be prescriptive.
Expand | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Aim and description The aim is to develop Develop student critical analysis and communication skills. Students write a critique of a text, either written or multimedia, and post it to the discussion forum. They must then comment on each other’s critiques using criteria or guidance set by the tutor. The activity could occur multiple times in a term but should be manageable to the student. Suggested assessment Discussion forum feedback on clarity of argument, evidence, communication skills, and grammar feeds forward into a summative critical review. Actions required by learner Write a critical review of a reading, engage with other student's reviews. Actions required by tutor(s)
|
Expand | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Aim and description The aim is to have Have students apply their knowledge in an authentic scenario. Students are given a scenario and a series of case questions that they must respond to in the discussion forum. Once they have provided their own answers, they must provide constructive feedback on other students’ posts. Suggested assessment Students are assessed on the quality and quantity of their posts, including proving a complete response to the case or scenario, using relevant evidence, clarity of expression, grammar, making the minimum number of substantial posts, and their ability to contribute rather than dominate the discussion. Actions Required by Learner Respond to case scenario and questions in forum in a substantive and timely manner. Make a constructive response to another learnerstudent's post. Actions Required by Tutor(s)
|
Expand | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Tim Neumann has kindly provided an example on running a live online debate with 2 groups on Moodle. The example provided below substitutes an asynchronous discussion forum for the live debate and includes a potential setup for when there are more than two debate groups. Aim and description The aim is to have Have students practice their critical thinking, persuasive writing, group work and communication skills. Students are divided into groups “For” and “Against” and are assigned to a thesis statement to debate in a discussion forum. Suggested assessment Student groups are assessed on their understanding of the thesis statement, presentation of their argument, and group work. Students are also assigned to one debate to read, and vote pre and post debate. Actions Required by Learner Critically analyse thesis statement from an assigned point of view; develop arguments and anticipate counterarguments. Organise argument structure and order of speaking. Take turns in groups, posting to the forum opening arguments, followed by speaker arguments, and finally closing arguments. Actions Required by Tutor(s)
|
Expand | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Aim and description: The aim is to have Have students share and discuss their experiences with one another to facilitate reflective thinking and peer learning. The experience could be a time on placement, a common experience or a general theme. Suggested assessment: Although discussion posts are not assessed, they can be used as evidence in a summative reflective blog. Actions Required by Learner: Write a reflective first-hand account of an experience. Post a reply to at least one other post. Actions Required by Tutor(s):
|
Expand | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Aim and description: The aim is to encourage Encourage empathetic and critical thinking by having students research and act out given roles. A student's responses must demonstrate their understanding of the role as applied to a scenario provided by the teacher. For example, a discussion of sustainability where students are given the role of conservationists, scientists, politicians, NGOs, stakeholders (see Oliver 2016). Alternatively, roles could be distinguished using a theoretical model or level of analysis, e.g. “explain the phenomena of hyperinflation from one of the following perspectives: Post-Keynesian, Monetarist, Macroeconomic, Microeconomic, or Behavioural Economics.” Suggested assessment: Students are assessed on their knowledge of the role as applied in the given scenario, as well as their presentation, communication skills, and group contribution. Actions Required by Learner: Collaborate with other group members to respond to the scenario and present to the class. Engage with and critique other presentations. Respond within the time allowed to follow up questions. Actions Required by Tutor(s):
References:Oliver, Simon. (2016). Integrating role-play with case study and carbon footprint monitoring: A transformative approach to enhancing learners’ social behavior for a more sustainable environment. 11. 1323-1335. 10.12973/ijese.2016.346a. |
...